Attest
Submitted to JMIRO — March 2026

The CAIOS Standard

Clinical AI Oversight Specification — the peer-reviewed evidentiary framework for responsible AI governance in healthcare.

92Clinical Governance87Risk Management91Regulatory Compliance88Evidence & Audit94Continuous Monitoring
90avg

What is CAIOS

Evidence requirements, not guidelines.

CAIOS defines what must be provable when AI assists a clinical decision. Not guidelines — evidence requirements. It specifies the artefacts, attestations, and audit trails a practice must maintain to demonstrate responsible governance to regulators, insurers, and courts.

Five domains

The evidentiary framework

DOMAIN 01

Clinical Governance

Organisational structures, accountability frameworks, and decision-making authority for AI oversight. Defines who is responsible, how decisions are escalated, and what governance bodies must exist.

AccountabilityEscalationOversight Bodies

DOMAIN 02

Risk Management

Identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks arising from clinical AI deployment.

Risk matrix

Likelihood

DOMAIN 03

Regulatory Compliance

Alignment with TGA, RANZCR, and emerging international AI governance frameworks.

TGARANZCR Ch.9NHMRCISO 14971

DOMAIN 04

Evidence & Audit

Immutable documentation of governance decisions, attestations, and evidentiary artefacts.

evidence-vault/
risk-assessment.pdf
governance-policy.pdf
audit-attestation.pdf
audit-pack-v2.zip

DOMAIN 05

Continuous Monitoring

Ongoing surveillance of AI system performance, drift, and compliance posture.

Compliance score94%
JanFebMar

Development

How CAIOS was built

2023

Research begins

Systematic review of AI governance gaps in clinical radiology across Australia and New Zealand.

2024

Framework drafted

Five-domain evidentiary framework developed from clinical observation, regulatory analysis, and medicolegal precedent.

2025

Peer review & refinement

Framework refined through expert consultation, pilot testing with radiology practices, and alignment with TGA guidance.

Mar 2026

Submitted to JMIRO

CAIOS submitted for peer review to the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology.

“When a coroner asks how your practice governed its AI — what’s your answer?”

Court-defensible evidence

Structured artefacts that meet the evidentiary bar for medicolegal proceedings, coronial inquests, and regulatory audits.

Insurer recognition

Demonstrate governance posture to medical indemnity insurers. CAIOS-certified practices signal reduced risk.

Regulatory alignment

Pre-aligned with TGA, RANZCR Ch.9, and NHMRC frameworks. When regulation catches up, you're already compliant.

Recognised by leading bodies

TGARANZCRNATAACPSEMAHPRANHMRCJMIRO / WileyTGARANZCRNATAACPSEMAHPRANHMRCJMIRO / Wiley

Get CAIOS certified.

Formal third-party verification that your practice meets the published evidentiary standard.

Contact us